On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So many transactions trying to update a small set of rows in a table.
> Is that what we really want to measure ? My thinking is that we might
> see different result if they are updating different parts of the table
> and the transaction start/stop overhead is spread across few
> statements.
>
I think what I am suggesting is that the default pgbench test setup
would probably not give you a good scalability as number of clients
are increased and one reason could be the contention in the small
table. So it might be a good idea to get rid of that and see if we get
much better scalability and understand other bottlenecks.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
