Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump
Date
Msg-id CABOikdN8TSnAcAn53_A5E6xgZCS64Bvs0TabOLyBwtBWRm5jwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump  (Gezeala M. Bacuño II <gezeala@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
(Adding -hackers. Did not realize it got dropped)

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II <gezeala@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Marie Bacuno II <gezeala@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 2:19, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > or have long running transactions ?
>>
>> Yes but I don't think there are when the snapshot was taken. Does the
>> pg_xlog_location_diff() result from latest and prior checkpoint upon
>> start-up indicates the size of replayed changes?
>>
>
> Thats the amount of additional WAL generated after you started the server.
>
>>
>> >
>> > BTW, the following query returns ~60GB. Thats the amount of WAL
>> > written after the server was started and at the end of pg_dump (I
>> > don't think pg_xlog_location_diff() is available in the older
>> > releases).
>> >
>> > postgres=# select pg_xlog_location_diff('4450/7A14F280',
>> > '4441/5E681F38')/(2^30);
>> >    ?column?
>> > ------------------
>> > 60.1980484202504
>>
>> It'll be great to know what the wals modified..?
>
>
> You would need something like xlogdump to decipher them. I quickly tried
> this and it seems to work against 8.4 version that you are running.
> https://github.com/snaga/xlogdump
>
> Download the source code, compile and run it against one of the most recent
> WAL files in the cluster against which you ran pg_dump. You would need to
> set PATH to contain the pg_config of the server you are running. Please post
> the output.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>
>

Here you go:

## last WAL
$ xlogdump -S /dbpool/data/pg_xlog/00000001000044500000007A

/dbpool/data/pg_xlog/00000001000044500000007A:

Unexpected page info flags 0003 at offset 0
Skipping unexpected continuation record at offset 0
ReadRecord: record with zero len at 17488/7A14F310
Unexpected page info flags 0001 at offset 150000
Skipping unexpected continuation record at offset 150000
Unable to read continuation page?
 ** maybe continues to next segment **
---------------------------------------------------------------
TimeLineId: 1, LogId: 17488, LogSegment: 122

Resource manager stats:
  [0]XLOG      : 3 records, 120 bytes (avg 40.0 bytes)
                 checkpoint: 3, switch: 0, backup end: 0
  [1]Transaction: 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
                 commit: 0, abort: 0
  [2]Storage   : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [3]CLOG      : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [4]Database  : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [5]Tablespace: 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [6]MultiXact : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [7]Reserved 7: 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [8]Reserved 8: 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [9]Heap2     : 2169 records, 43380 bytes (avg 20.0 bytes)
  [10]Heap      : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
                 ins: 0, upd/hot_upd: 0/0, del: 0
  [11]Btree     : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [12]Hash      : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [13]Gin       : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [14]Gist      : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)
  [15]Sequence  : 0 record, 0 byte (avg 0.0 byte)

Backup block stats: 2169 blocks, 16551816 bytes (avg 7631.1 bytes)


I think both my theories seem to be holding up. Heap2 resource manager is used only for vacuum freeze, lazy vacuum or HOT prune. Given your access pattern, I bet its the third activity that kicking in on your database. You got many pages with dead tuples and they are getting cleaned at the first opportunity, which happens to be the pg_dump thats run immediately after the server restart. This is seen by all 2169 WAL records in the file being attributed to the Heap2 RM above.

Whats additionally happening is each of these records are on different heap pages. The cleanup activity dirties those pages. Since each of these pages is being dirtied for the first time after a recent checkpoint and full_page_writes is turned ON, entire page is backed up in the WAL record. You can see the exact number of backup blocks in the stats above.

I don't think we have any mechanism to control or stop HOT from doing what it wants to do, unless you are willing to run a modified server for this reason. But you can at least bring down the WAL volume by turning full_page_writes OFF.

Thanks,
Pavan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: improving python3 regression test setup
Next
From: Gezeala M. Bacuño II
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump