On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Grittner
> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>
>
>> That makes sense to me. The reason I didn't make that change when I
>> added the serializable special case to pg_dump was that it seemed
>> like a separate question; I didn't want to complicate an already big
>> patch with unnecessary changes to non-serializable transactions.
>>
>
> If we agree, should we change that now ?
>
Sorry for posting on such an old thread. But here is a patch that
fixes this. I'm also adding to the next commitfest so that we don't
lose track of it again.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
