> it is not hard to replace it internally even if it breaks the not-public-API
I fully agree here. Sorry that we moved off-topic.
>Final note, is a ConcurrentLinkedHashMap actually the data structure we should be using?
I am not yet sure which API of CLHM would be used. I just assume CLHM
allows some "smart eviction".
If it turns out CLHM is a no-no in pgjdbc, I might have to resort to a
org.postgresql.util.LruCache[128] kind of data structure.
I do not like that very much (even though it would make me a bit happy
for reusing my own code), so I want feedback on policy of using
dependencies.
Vladimir
