Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-ExO8MmbXoqf7k6evYAFTMZGvx39a4Z9aHwSjbiChi9+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
List pgsql-jdbc
Tree view
Naming things is hard.
pgjdbc 13.0 will probably interfere with PostgreSQL 13.0 in a near future.

Believe me or not, but we did have exactly the same discussion a year ago:

The suggestion was "42" as a major version to avoid clash with database version: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB%3DJe-HraoNEWyNFEUSxGjRpH-gC78jHXvDoxnH%2B0wBe%3Dc1rNg%40mail.gmail.com 

Should we make it happen? )


Vladimir

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion