Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ian Lawrence Barwick
Subject Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Date
Msg-id CAB8KJ=iUcXgdDO_Znb1aMQeUV6fQk+6+9xh9xdzHjutwh+Ajfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?  (Steve Rogerson <steve.git@woodsideendurance.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
2023年4月6日(木) 0:02 Steve Rogerson <steve.git@woodsideendurance.co.uk>:
>
> On 05/04/2023 11:23, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > Judging by the commit message and changed test cases, probably:
> >
> > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=921d749bd4c34c3349f1c254d5faa2f1cec03911
> >
> That's the one. I can't see which pg version(s) this turned up in.

$ git tag --contains 921d749bd4c34c3349f1c254d5faa2f1cec03911 | head -1
REL8_0_0

Regards

Ian Barwick



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Rogerson
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?