Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTvb=_2-kaA6cmzp9zAAxD+vBDOMk8vv6VpO6LNCHXGpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This
>> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much
>> progress. This thread is idle for 4 months now.
>
> This thread and the other one kind of merged.  The last update on the
> overall discussion is here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150930111120.GM3685@tamriel.snowman.net

Right. The CF entry links to two threads, and I somehow missed the first one.

> Which was closer to 1.5 months ago and was the requested split of the
> patch, which mainly needs to get review and/or buy-in from others on the
> reservation of the role prefix 'pg_' (which is the first patch).
> I'm happy to update the patches if they don't apply, of course, but
> they're relatively straight-forward and we just need to agree that
> reservation of the prefix is acceptable and then I can just commit
> them.

I'll reply directly on the other thread, there is no meaning to mess
up things here.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data
Next
From: Victor Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch (3): Implement failover on libpq connect level.