Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
Date
Msg-id 20151117203626.GW3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael,

* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This
> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much
> progress. This thread is idle for 4 months now.

This thread and the other one kind of merged.  The last update on the
overall discussion is here:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150930111120.GM3685@tamriel.snowman.net

Which was closer to 1.5 months ago and was the requested split of the
patch, which mainly needs to get review and/or buy-in from others on the
reservation of the role prefix 'pg_' (which is the first patch).

I'm happy to update the patches if they don't apply, of course, but
they're relatively straight-forward and we just need to agree that
reservation of the prefix is acceptable and then I can just commit
them.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Erroneous cost estimation for nested loop join