Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert()
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTvMhPPQqJ6frHBKuce12e-CKwqJYHPc_ZjNGqmu=Y_cw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert()  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> The regression tests have zero coverage for this
>> tuplesort_performsort() "btspool2" case. That's a fairly common case
>> to have no coverage for, and that took me all of 5 minutes to find.
>
> BTW, I looked here because I added a bunch of sortsupport stuff to
> _bt_load() in 9.5. It appears that that new code is entirely without
> coverage.

That's not cool. A patch for the src/test/regress area would be welcome.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL-related tools and .paritial WAL file
Next
From: Pavel Golub
Date:
Subject: Re: raw output from copy