Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTsymCHtBjx_F-efYLFyXmA2VJrfmrpokeSh-SJcgVxVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah and I think something like that can happen after your patch
> because now the memory for tuples returned via TupleQueueReaderNext
> will be allocated in ExecutorState and that can last for long.   I
> think it is better to free memory, but we can leave it as well if you
> don't feel it important.  In any case, I have written a patch, see if
> you think it makes sense.

OK. I can see some fresh and unreviewed patches so moved to next CF.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager