Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTpyxxVgtbGtDcMFV07pEqn6h+iBNdPbHSsLA-WSOdjsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]  (Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com>)
Responses Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]  (Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com> wrote:

(Please top-post on threads, this is annoying)

> One more thing came to my mind:
> WAL records done by the GiST before patch will corrupt GiST after
> patch if replayed.
> Is it a problem? May be it's prevented on some higher level?

If a feature changes the shape of WAL records, XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC is
bumped to prevent any problems.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: copyParamList