On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Certainly, there's opportunities to improve the flexibility of the
> index-disable specifications in the plug-in Oleg and Teodor did. But
> I think that that is the right basic approach: some sort of SET command,
> not anything that alters the catalogs. We already have lots of
> infrastructure that could handle desires like having specific values
> active in only some sessions.
ISTM that an intuitive answer is something like enable_indexscan_list
= 'index1, index2' and not worry about any disable switch, that's more
in line with the equivalent planner-level GUC.
--
Michael
