Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTUYRSFCgRmcktgrzd+dcEcDw5DR3=uEHmS8_wDQjRuTQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> We could also do this by loading a C module during the regression
> tests, which seems maybe less ugly than adding a GUC.
> I don't particularly like your suggestion of spooky action at a
> distance between force_parallel_mode and regression_test_mode.  That
> just seems kooky.

One downside of the plugin is that any users willing to do make
installcheck would need to install it as well.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: RecoveryTargetTLI dead variable in XLogCtlData