Re: option -T in pg_basebackup doesn't work on windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: option -T in pg_basebackup doesn't work on windows
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTR2sQ21soBtnxPRcsztph4DkLHFtfwbgKxtg3cb4CHHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: option -T in pg_basebackup doesn't work on windows  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > It's not ready for committer if the current patch does not apply.
>> FWIW, the latest version sent by Amit here applies correctly:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1+cC9RB1S9Q4+nSOkfas1YufVFGFxUHxY_6wLBQ1ReroQ@mail.gmail.com
>> I haven't tested it myself though.
>>
>> However, independently on this patch and as pointed by MauMau, the
>> code that has been committed in fb05f3c is incorrect in the way it
>> defines the tablespace path, this:
>> psprintf("%s/pg_tblspc/%d", basedir, oid);
>> should be this:
>> psprintf("%s/pg_tblspc/%u", basedir, oid);
>> I am separating this fix (that should be backpatched to REL9_4_STABLE
>> as well), in the patch attached if this helps.
>
> I think the patch provided by me needs to be back patched to
> 9.4 as this is a new option introduced in 9.4 which is not working
> on windows.
Yep. Definitely. This will fix both issues at the same time.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why not ISO 8601 format for date values rendered into JSON?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes