Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT8B7DHTgMcTVZ4SGhQGAAUqBrdFin9VCd+D+7MtmhUxQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better
> than what we have today.
Well, if somebody has some interest in that, here is a rebased patch
with the approach using low-level locks:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRkwKFgn4BFUybqU-Oo-=Gcbq0K-8H93Gr6fX-GGRPDXg@mail.gmail.com
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Similar to csvlog but not really, json logs?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins