On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAB7nPqSXcdM-5nFWDf8zuKmW8j_ooE6zYRqYQasp0fjKxKDX2A@mail.gmail.com>
> > Regarding the patch, I
> > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft
> > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need.
> > Thoughts?
>
> Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do
> something like the following for the original objective.
Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread..
--
Michael
