Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT2qRwnEZmxp0H3RVvwfAKvhQYZdfr-sj_gZfKGFwL1CQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have prepared separate patches for hash and btree index.  I think
> for another type of indexes, it is better to first fix the pd_lower
> issue.

Just wondering (sorry I have not looked at your patch in details)...
Have you tested the compressibility effects of this patch on FPWs with
and without wal_compression?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order