On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Oleksandr Shulgin wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> So, attached is take three for all the other things above.
>
> There's still one call to pqGetErrorNotice3 that doesn't check returned
> value for -2, in fe-connect.c. Shouldn't we also check it like this:
>
> [...]
Yes, you are right. Take 4 attached is updated with something similar
to what you sent to cover this code path.
--
Michael
