On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Do we really need to add a number like '1' in '1(a, b), c, d'?
> The order of writing names already implies priorities like 2 & 3 for c & d,
> respectively, like in your example. Having to write '1' for the group '(a, b)'
> seems unnecessary, IMHO. Sorry if I have missed any previous discussion where
> its necessity was discussed.
'1' is implied if no number is specified. That's the idea as written
here, not something decided of course :)
> So, the order of writing standby names in the list should declare their
> relative priorities and parentheses (possibly nested) should help inform about
> the grouping (for quorum?)
Yes.
--
Michael
