Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSmXKjj+dxKjHWn-wJvDrCVJ2rTTQbxuQ0weRhYuSZuww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh, well. I have just implemented it on top of the two other patches
>> for pg_basebackup. For pg_receivexlog, I am wondering if it makes
>> sense to have it. That would be trivial to implement it, and I think
>> that we had better make the combination of --synchronous and --nosync
>> just leave with an error. Thoughts about having that for
>> pg_receivexlog?
>
> With patches that's actually better..

Meh, meh et meh.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions