Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqShY1tK_u0kfZ-yhsaUGVsG+mPp7dd-4jsN_NRS6myT0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Ok.  I see that there is a new compelling reason to move the ring
> buffer to the sender side: then I think lag tracking will work
> automatically for the new logical replication that just landed on
> master.  I will try it that way.  Thanks for the feedback!

Seeing no new patches, marked as returned with feedback. Feel free of
course to refresh the CF entry once you have a new patch!
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Forbid use of LF and CR characters in database and role names