Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > > Michael Paquier wrote:
> > This looks great as a starting point. I think we should make TestLib > > depend on PostgresNode instead of the other way around. I will have a > > look at that (I realize this means messing with the existing tests). > > Makes sense. My thoughts following that is that we should keep a track of > the nodes started as an array which is part of TestLib, with PGHOST set > once at startup using tempdir_short. That's surely an refactoring patch > somewhat independent of the recovery test suite. I would not mind writing > something among those lines if needed.
OK, please do.
We can split this up in two patches: one introducing PostgresNode (+ RecursiveCopy) together with the refactoring of existing test code, and a subsequent one introducing RecoveryTest and the corresponding subdir. Sounds good?
Yeah, that matches my line of thoughts. Will do so.
