On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, as Horiguchi-san pointed out earlier, walreceiver seems need the
> similar fix.
Actually, now that I look at it, ready_to_display should as well be
protected by the lock of the WAL receiver, so it is incorrectly placed
in walreceiver.h. As you are pointing out, pg_stat_get_wal_receiver()
is lazy as well, and that's new in 10, so we have an open item here
for both of them. And I am the author for both things. No issues
spotted in walreceiverfuncs.c after review.
I am adding an open item so as both issues are fixed in PG10. With the
WAL sender part, I think that this should be a group shot.
So what do you think about the attached?
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
