On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 10/22/15 1:42 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I am not sure that I am not getting completely your point, why would
>> it be a win to remove this safety check? We surely do not want to look
>> for the common ancestor timeline if the target and source nodes have
>> the same timeline, so we should not remove this check and just set
>> rewind_needed to false to fallback to the same exit(0) for all those
>> code paths. Per se the attached for example.
>
> After playing with this a bit, I think your patch is correct. The code
> has drifted a bit in the meantime, so attached is an updated patch.
Thanks for looking at it.
> Your patch added variable initializations for divergerec and
> lastcommontli. Was that to avoid compiler warnings about uninitialized
> variables? I didn't get these here. If that's the issue, maybe these
> initializations should be moved to the if (same timeline) branch, to get
> it a bit closer to the action.
Looking again at this patch, I don't actually recall why I added them.
It does not matter to initialize them anyway..
> I also added a test for this case. (It would currently fail.)
Thanks, this looks good to me.
--
Michael
