Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSFytTZrXgZQzqrduEZqcR91LcMgxOFZovHzcd-L6-aDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> +1,
> FDW looks OK for prototyping pluggable storage, but it doesn't seem suitable
> for permanent implementation.
> BTW, Hadi, could you visit "Pluggable storage" thread and check how suitable
> upcoming pluggable storage API is for cstore?

I cannot make a clear opinion about this patch. Not changing the
situation, or changing it have both downsides and upsides. The
suggestion from Alexander is surely something to look at. I am bumping
this to next CF for now..
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries