On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
>> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> This is a rebased version of the patch.
>>
>> As far as I can see, the patch still applies, compiles, and got no
>> reviews. So moved to next CF.
>
> I think we have to mark this as returned with feedback or rejected for
> the reasons mentioned here:
>
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZjn28uYJRQ2K+5idhYxWBDER68sctoc2p_nW7h7JbhYw@mail.gmail.com
Good point. I forgot this bit. Thanks for mentioning it I am switching
the patch as returned with feedback.
--
Michael
