Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobPHMmQEEUFDU6XCSj5ArEfyagS1+wisJ8QAY+EsUNbxg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> This is a rebased version of the patch.
>
> As far as I can see, the patch still applies, compiles, and got no
> reviews. So moved to next CF.

I think we have to mark this as returned with feedback or rejected for
the reasons mentioned here:

http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZjn28uYJRQ2K+5idhYxWBDER68sctoc2p_nW7h7JbhYw@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] create_unique_path and GEQO
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.