Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSFttjNB_2kAHa8OdNGJjvzakucGf24tsfkV-kRxqbo5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding)  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > Do you see the difference between what your doc patch states and the
>> > explanation I've given nearby in this thread?
>> Perhaps that's the lack of documentation...
>
> Man. I've explained it to you about three times. The previous attempts
> at doing so didn't seem to help. If my explanations don't explain it so
> you can understand it adding them to the docs won't change a thing.
> That's why I ask whether you see the difference?
Urg sorry for the misunderstanding. The patch stated that this
parameter only influences the output of the SQL functions while it
defines if "the output plugin requires the output method to support
binary data"?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding)
Next
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves)