On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I have written similar logic, and while it's not pleasant, it's doable.
> This issue would really only go away if you don't use a file to signal
> recovery at all, which you have argued for, but which is really a
> separate and more difficult problem.
Moving this patch to the next CF and marking it as returned with
feedback for current CF as there is visibly no consensus reached.
--
Michael
