On 2015-01-16 21:43:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > I have written similar logic, and while it's not pleasant, it's doable.
> > This issue would really only go away if you don't use a file to signal
> > recovery at all, which you have argued for, but which is really a
> > separate and more difficult problem.
> Moving this patch to the next CF and marking it as returned with
> feedback for current CF as there is visibly no consensus reached.
I don't think that's a good idea. If we defer this another couple months
we'l *never* reach anything coming close to concensus.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
