Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS+6gPp44CrhdnZqTM+4at=nfNenp-6spd_Yc2a=xZwOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> digoal@126.com writes:
>> master=# create unlogged table tbl12(id int);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> master=# \set VERBOSITY verbose
>> master=# create index idx1 on tbl12 using bloom (id);
>> ERROR:  XX000: index "idx1" already contains data
>> LOCATION:  blbuildempty, blinsert.c:164
>
> Isn't this a duplicate of bug #14155?

Yes, you already fixed that with abaffa90 yesterday.
--
Michael

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14156: Password Autehentication