Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRy88wjbRZL2tyWWYb1td0BMcdPaehwmu0VWxv6mj3fMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 10/28/16 3:49 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The change from 10 to 11 increases the tests that are skipped on Windows,
> which is necessary because one extra symlink test is added.
>
> I think you need:
>
> [...]
>
> The rest of the tests are for exclusions.

Indeed, giving the attached for REL9_6_STABLE. You could as well have
a test for pg_stat_tmp but honestly that's not worth it. One thing I
have noticed is that the patch does not use _tarWriteDir() for
pg_xlog. I think it should even if that's not addressing directly a
bug...
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: multivariate statistics (v19)