Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRwpFs9YPGumkw2c0stfOHFkpE_2VmPjdA3rCctHFxYjA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Michael
Paquier<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com"
target="_blank">michael.paquier@gmail.com</a>></span>wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:15 PM,
AlexShulgin <<a href="mailto:ash@commandprompt.com">ash@commandprompt.com</a>> wrote:<br /> > Michael Paquier
<<ahref="mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com">michael.paquier@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br /> >>>><br />
>>>>Perhaps ssloptions.[ch], unless you plan to add non-option-related code<br /> >>>> there
later?<br/> >>><br /> >>> I don't think anything else than common options-related code fits in<br />
>>>there, so ssloptions.c makes sense to me.<br /> >>><br /> >>>> BTW, there is no Regent
codein your openssl.c, so the copyright<br /> >>>> statement is incorrect.<br /> >>><br />
>>>Good catch, I just blindly copied that from some other file.<br /> >> There have been arguments in
favorand against this patch... But<br /> >> marking it as returned with feedback because of a lack of activity
in<br/> >> the last couple of weeks. Feel free to update if you think that's not<br /> >> correct, and
pleasemove this patch to commit fest 2014-12.<br /> ><br /> > Attached is a new version that addresses the
earlierfeedback: renamed<br /> > the added *.[ch] files and removed incorrect copyright line.<br /> ><br /> >
I'mmoving this to the current CF.<br /></div></div>This patch is statuquo since the beginning of this CF, at the<br />
argumentsare standing the same. If there is nothing happening maybe<br /> it would be better to mark it as returned
withfeedback? Thoughts?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br /></font></span></blockquote></div><br
/></div><divclass="gmail_extra">I am not sure where we are moving on here, and if anybody cares much about this
patch...Hence marked as rejected. Feel free to complain...<br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature">Michael<br
/></div></div></div>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal