Re: pg_basebackup wish list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_basebackup wish list
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRtE5vXZJBT0cZeQ8fPXuFVHhr2hPiTZoYqecxEYYyh0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup wish list  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup wish list  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 9/12/16 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, there was just a kerfuffle about spelling things like this
>> "--no-clean" etc.  I wasn't on board with removing existing spellings,
>> but surely all newly added switches should use the "no-" spelling?
>
> This is supposed to be parallel to initdb's option.  So if we rename or
> migrate the one in initdb, then we can just hard-rename this one.  But
> until that is decided, it seems better to keep it the same as initdb has
> right now.

PostgresNode.pm had better use the new --noclean option in its calls,
the new default is not useful for debugging. Please see attached.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Event trigger and CREATE/ALTER ROLE/USER