Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRjA1w=Bav0NwWR_8dbdZKAQogcb-6xVCnfM5N_01L+kA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 9 Nov. 2016 06:37, "Yury Zhuravlev" <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> This approach I see only in Postgres project and not fully understood.
>> Can you explain me more what reasons led to this approach?
>
> It's predictable. The default has the same result for everyone. I quite like
> it myself.

+1. Let's tell to the system what we want him to do and not let him
guess what we'd like to be done or it will get harder to test and
develop code for all kind of code paths with #ifdef's. That's one step
away from Skynet.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Next
From: Hao Lee
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?