Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRdQ-OX85BX2Qs8OCywcBTvbBg+-LszQ9eAMh+SkBtU5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> updated patch attached.

Thanks for the new version.

> Added tap tests patch also attached.

This begins to look really nice. I am having fun torturing it :)

Here are I think my last comments:

+   linecxt = tokenize_file(HbaFileName, file, &hba_lines,
&hba_line_nums, &hba_raw_lines);
+   FreeFile(file);
tokenize_file can leave on ERROR, in which case the file descriptor
would leak. You much likely need a
PG_END_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP/PG_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP block here with a
callback to FreeFile() if an error is caught.

+     <entry>
+      ADDRESS specifies the set of hosts the record matches.
+      It can be a host name, or it is made up of an IP address
+      or keywords such as (<literal>all</literal>,
+      <literal>samehost</literal> and <literal>samenet</literal>).
+     </entry>
Why is that upper-case?

+     <entry>
+      If not null, an error message indicating why this
+      rule could not be loaded
+     </entry>
Need a dot here, that's a sentence.

src/test/regress/expected/rules.out needs to be refreshed, regression
tests are failing.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take