On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> The approach introducing the concept of WAL progress addresses the
> problem of unnecessary checkpoints and of unnecessary standby
> snapshots. If we take the problem only from the angle of RUNNING_XACTS
> the current logic used to check if a checkpoint should be skipped or
> not is not addressed.
This discussion has been stalling for a while regarding the main
patches... Attached are rebased versions based on the approach with
XLogInsertExtended(). And I have added as well a couple of days ago an
entry on the 9.6 open item page, not as a 9.6 open item, but as an
older bug to keep at least track of this problem.
--
Michael
