Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRM73BE7ou84BZ0OWU6r9uwHzXbhjXxhTwoBgpe54y50Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note as well that I will be fine with any decision taken by the
> committer who picks up this, this test case is useful by itself in any
> case.

And I just recalled that I actually did no tests for this thing on
Windows. As this uses the TAP facility, I think that it makes most
sense to run it with tapcheck instead of modulescheck in vcregress.pl
because of its dependency with IPC::Run. The compilation with MSVC is
fixed as well.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Explanation for intermittent buildfarm pg_upgradecheck failures
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies