Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRDvJn18e54ccNpOP1A2_iUN6-iU=4nJgmMgiAgvcSDKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
> after introduced quorum.
> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.

Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does
not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be
GA soon.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Install extensions using update scripts (was Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple)
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take