Re: Bug in pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Bug in pg_dump
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQwJFyKLdq-088aTxRcEL=6R8f5BamRk6zusrcSpUxjfQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in pg_dump  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> > Please see the latest version of this, attached.  I've removed the left
>> > join, re-used the 'query' buffer (instead of destroying and recreating
>> > it), and added a bit of documentation, along with a note in the commit
>> > message for the release notes.
>>
>> Thanks, those modifications look good to me.
>
> Ok, I've pushed the pg_dump fix for all the branches it applies to.

Thanks.

>> > Would be great if you could review it and let me know.  As mentioned in
>> > my other email, I'm happy to include the TAP test in master once we've
>> > worked out the correct way to handle installing the extension for
>> > testing in the Makefile system.
>>
>> Sure. As that's unrelated to this thread, perhaps we could discuss
>> this point on another thread with refreshed patches? I'd like to hear
>> some input from Peter on the matter as well.
>
> That's fine with me- feel free to start a new thread with new patches.

Will do so.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Idea: GSoC - Query Rewrite with Materialized Views
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL