Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQuj+-dKuvPGG59yvD3MFqch1ewMNEi+LOC8LBwq5e7YA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> In get_rel_oids() we often switch the memory context to vac_context
> and switch back. As a result almost code in get_rel_oids() is working
> in vac_context. Maybe we can switch memory context before and after
> the calling get_rel_oids?

I thought about that as well, and it seemed to me that the current
patch approach is less bug-prone for the future if get_rel_oids() gets
called in some future code paths.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands