Re: replication commands and log_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: replication commands and log_statements
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQjFY_Z0jgafsSbcqVpetHo_ywmcguwd6kBGqjEkdnQAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replication commands and log_statements  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: replication commands and log_statements
List pgsql-hackers



On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think ideally it would have been better if we could have logged
> replication commands under separate log_level, but as still there
> is no consensus on extending log_statement and nobody is even
> willing to pursue, it seems okay to go ahead and log these under
> 'all' level.

I think the consensus is clearly for a separate GUC.
+1.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org