Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: replication commands and log_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: replication commands and log_statements
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobbpoS3woHeDcF0kzeEZ3ZXTY-J7BCi7Sj0MtOgX_cfVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replication commands and log_statements  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: replication commands and log_statements
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think ideally it would have been better if we could have logged
> replication commands under separate log_level, but as still there
> is no consensus on extending log_statement and nobody is even
> willing to pursue, it seems okay to go ahead and log these under
> 'all' level.

I think the consensus is clearly for a separate GUC.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Next
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes