Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQYxPziUaji=C+Bsu6LDX-z+AKwZamfR-y7qYZmkEWUjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Yes, quite possibly, actually. I should've just got Haroon to build me a new
> initdb without the priv setting and with creation of crashdumps/ .
>
> It might be worth testing that out and adding an initdb startup flag to
> create the directory, since initdb is such a PITA to debug.

I was more thinking about putting that under -DDEBUG for example.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd behavior with domains