Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F59A4A7@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 11:37 AM
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> It might be worth testing that out and adding an initdb startup flag
> > to create the directory, since initdb is such a PITA to debug.
> 
> I was more thinking about putting that under -DDEBUG for example.
> 

I think just the existing option -d (--debug) and/or -n (--no-clean) would be OK.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd behavior with domains
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code