Re: Is this a bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Is this a bug?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQRo7wcKpKLiWr6TDDXR-bo81QT8c07WUsJawgJ5nL1FA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this a bug?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Is this a bug?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >
> >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see any
> >> discussion around it.
> >
> > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really subscribe
> > to pgsql-committers.
>
> I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
> to -hackers.

I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently.  Since recently, I make
a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
force of habit I often forget.
 
Noted. I usually don't do that.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE