Re: Is this a bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Is this a bug?
Date
Msg-id 20150905120320.GA3133@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this a bug?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep  4, 2015 at 09:40:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>     Robert Haas wrote:
>     > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>     > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>     > > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>     > >
>     > >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see
>     any
>     > >> discussion around it.
>     > >
>     > > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really
>     subscribe
>     > > to pgsql-committers.
>     >
>     > I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
>     > to -hackers.
> 
>     I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently.  Since recently, I make
>     a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
>     force of habit I often forget.
> 
>  
> Noted. I usually don't do that.

I am thinking we should all agree if we should redirect commit comments
to hackers, or not, so we are consistent.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain