Re: Is this a bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Is this a bug?
Date
Msg-id 20150903185216.GF2912@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this a bug?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is this a bug?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >
> >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see any
> >> discussion around it.
> >
> > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really subscribe
> > to pgsql-committers.
> 
> I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
> to -hackers.

I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently.  Since recently, I make
a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
force of habit I often forget.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: PG_CATCH used without PG_RETHROW