On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I think we ought to fix xideqint4 to be marked leakproof and then
> add this test. That would only be in HEAD though since it'd require
> an initdb. Any objections?
FWIW, this makes sense.
> Is there a reason to believe that a
> built-in function might be leakproof when invoked from one function
> OID but not another?
I can't think about one after pondering about that a bit...
--
Michael
