On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> ISTM that the proper solution to that problem is the introduction of
> new synchronous replication mode which makes the transaction wait for
> its WAL to be replayed by the standby. If this mode is used, a client
> doesn't need to track the LSN of each transaction and check whether
> the committed transaction has already replayed by the standby or not.
Don't you need to combine that with the possibility to wait for N
targets instead of 1 in synchronous_standby_names? You may want to be
sure that the commit is done on a series of standbys before
considering any further operations after this transaction commit.
--
Michael
